OpenMetaAnalyst features a modern graphical user interface (GUI), but interfaces with R “under the hood”.
#COMPREHENSIVE META ANALYSIS FREE SOFTWARE SOFTWARE#
More specifically, the software will include methods for performing Bayesian meta-analysis, multivariate meta-analysis and network meta-analysis in addition to all standard fixed and random effects methods.
Unfortunately, the methods available in such software are usually dated new methods are implemented in statistical programming languages such as R.Īpproach: OpenMetaAnalyst is a free, cross-platform, open-source program for performing meta-analysis of efficacy and diagnostic test accuracy studies that aims to combine the ease-of-use of graphical, spread-sheet driven software with more advanced analytic options. This is primarily a consequence of software meta-analysts tend not be programmers, and so use whatever is made available to them via graphics-driven (point-and-click) software. Given the vital role of meta-analyses, it is therefore imperative that they are performed correctly, i.e., that appropriate statistical techniques are used to guide meta-analyses so that the conclusions are sound.ĭespite this need, however, most meta-analysts are familiar with only basic meta-analytic methods, limiting the accuracy and power of analyses. Indeed, by quantitatively summarizing the available evidence pertaining to precise clinical questions, meta-analyses can inform clinical practice at all levels of healthcare. The related projects can be accessed on the right side of this page.īackground: Meta-analysis, the quantitative synthesis of information from independent sources (studies), forms a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine (EBM). This is one of four related projects designed to document the current standards and methods used in the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests, validate newly proposed methods, develop new statistical methods to perform meta-analyses of diagnostic tests, and then to incorporate these insights into computer software that will be available to all EPCs and others conducting reviews of diagnostic tests.
0 kommentar(er)
